Muslim control over the Indian subcontinent, especially in areas south of modern Pakistan, was always somewhat precarious. Whatever Muslim dynasty happened to be in power at any given time was guaranteed to be part of a religious minority ruling over a vast number of Hindu subjects. The Mughal Empire, which ruled northern India, modern Pakistan, and modern Bangladesh for most of its lifespan and expanded deep into southern India in the late 17th century, had to manage this problem throughout its history, which led to some interesting developments like Emperor Akbar’s (d. 1605) Din-i Ilahi movement, which emphasized religious tolerance and combined elements of Islam and Hinduism (and other faiths) into an imperial religious syncretism that was intended to win broad acceptance among all of his subjects. Of course the Mughals also ruled sizable Muslim populations in the Sindh region and in Bengal, so they weren’t entirely without a natural base of support. But, again, that base constituted a minority of their subjects and they had to take that into account.
This is just a placeholder. If you’d like to read the rest please check out my new home, Foreign Exchanges!
2 thoughts on “Today in South Asian history: the Battle of Talikota (1565)”
Is there any info on the religious makeup of the armies? I know that Mahmud of Ghazni and the Mughal Empires incorporated Hindu soldiers into their militaries, but do you happen to know if the Deccan Sultanates did the same?
I don’t, but I will say it’s almost impossible to imagine a Muslim dynasty in 16th century central India operating without any Hindus in the army. The Vijayanagara reportedly had Muslims in their army, so I think it’s safe to say the reverse was true for the Deccan Sultanates.